The executive role responsible for AI readiness, governance, oversight, and human–AI teams across the enterprise.
This isn't a traditional job listing. It's a forward-looking executive function. The VP of Intelligence Resources™ is the leader responsible for ensuring that an organization is structurally ready for AI — and that human–AI teams and intelligent systems stay aligned with governance, risk, and human oversight.
The Vice President of Intelligence Resources™ (VP IR) is a founder-defined executive role that owns the Intelligence Resources™ function inside the enterprise. Where HR manages people and IT manages technology, the VP IR is accountable for managing AI readiness, governance structures, and the integrity and performance of human–AI teams and intelligent systems.
This leader stewards a cross-functional portfolio spanning Legal, Risk, Compliance, Data, and Engineering. The VP IR introduces consistent readiness standards, decision frameworks, and oversight routines so AI initiatives — and the human–AI teams that run them — do not outpace the organization's capacity to manage them responsibly.
Required: Bachelor's degree in Legal Studies, Business Administration, Risk Management, or related field. MBA, Master of Business Administration, or graduate certificate in business administration strongly preferred.
Creativity and interdisciplinary thinking are essential. The VP IR must be able to synthesize insights across Legal, Technical, and Business domains to design novel solutions. This role requires intellectual curiosity, pattern recognition across disparate fields, and the ability to envision organizational structures that don't yet exist.
Professional certifications in governance, risk management, compliance, or AI ethics are a plus but not required.
Important: A JD (law degree) is not required and may not be optimal for this role. The VP of Intelligence Resources™ must understand legal and regulatory frameworks but should not be a practicing attorney. Lawyers are trained to practice law and minimize legal risk—which creates the same structural bias that makes Legal departments unsuitable owners of AI governance. IR requires someone who can balance legal compliance, business velocity, and technical feasibility without defaulting to risk avoidance. A background in legal operations, compliance operations, or business operations—combined with cross-functional leadership experience and creative organizational design capabilities—is ideal.
The VP of Intelligence Resources™ leads a dedicated enterprise function that operates alongside IT, HR, and Risk. Depending on organizational design, this role may report directly to the CEO, Chief Risk Officer, General Counsel, or another executive charged with enterprise-wide oversight.
As human–AI teams become a normalized way of working, the VP IR anchors their design and oversight at the enterprise level. Regardless of reporting line, the VP IR is expected to have cross-functional authority and direct access to senior leadership to ensure that AI readiness, governance, and oversight are treated as strategic priorities rather than downstream concerns.
The VP of Intelligence Resources™ typically reports to one of three executives:
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) — Best for organizations treating AI as a transformational priority requiring direct C-suite oversight and strategic visibility.
Chief Risk Officer (CRO) — Best for highly regulated industries where AI governance aligns naturally with enterprise risk frameworks.
General Counsel (GC) — Best when AI governance is initially compliance-driven, though the VP of IR must maintain independent decision rights.
IR operates as an independent function that coordinates across all enterprise departments. Unlike assigning AI governance to Legal, Risk, or Product—which creates structural bias—IR has no competing primary mandate and orchestrates across functions as a peer.
How IR Coordinates With Each Department:
With Legal: IR requests legal interpretation of regulations; Legal provides compliance requirements; IR translates into operational guardrails and owns governance decisions
With Risk: IR requests AI-specific threat modeling; Risk provides enterprise risk frameworks; IR integrates AI risks and owns readiness assessment
With Product: IR provides readiness assessment and governance criteria; Product designs within approved boundaries; IR approves initiatives at key gates
With IT: IR defines technical control requirements; IT implements solutions; IR validates controls meet governance criteria
With HR: IR designs workforce transformation initiatives; HR implements training and hiring; Partnership on multidimensional fluency
With Finance: IR provides AI investment priorities and ROI measurement frameworks; Finance manages budget allocation and vendor procurement
The VP of Intelligence Resources™ leads a multidisciplinary team organized around four core functions. Team size scales with organizational complexity, ranging from 5-7 people in mid-market companies to 13-21 people in large enterprises.
Team Size by Organization Scale:
• Small/Mid-Market (500-2,000 employees): 5-7 people total
• Mid-Enterprise (2,000-10,000 employees): 9-13 people total
• Large Enterprise (10,000+ employees): 13-21 people total
The VP of Intelligence Resources™ is a founder-originated executive role conceived by Ciph Lab™ as part of the broader Intelligence Resources™ discipline. It is intended as a mirror for what forward-thinking enterprises will eventually formalize: a dedicated function for managing AI readiness, governance, human–AI teams, and integrity.
This page is not a job posting. It is a blueprint for a role that organizations can reference, adapt, and eventually instantiate as their AI maturity evolves. Ciph Lab™ partners with enterprises that are ready to explore Intelligence Resources™ as a formal function.
© 2025 Ciph Lab™. All rights reserved.
San Francisco, CA
Intelligence Resources™, VP of Intelligence Resources™, and related frameworks are founder-originated IP of Ciph Lab™. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or adaptation is prohibited. Reference and internal discussion are permitted with attribution.